Legal Opinion

United States v. McLean

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 2015No. Criminal Action No. 13-CR-00487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McHUGH, District Judge.

I. Introduction

The case before me arises out of a string of highly successful but increasingly controversial undercover sting operations utilized by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). These operations involve the recruitment of individuals to participate in the robbery of a fictional crack cocaine “stash house” with a handsome prospective pay-off of cash and drugs. The stings began in Miami during the 1990s — a period where frequent instances of real stash house robberies were creating a threat to the public, and law-abiding…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. McLeanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. United States v. ProutDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API