Legal Opinion

Falk v. Burke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1914No. 19,018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Atchison district court; William A. Jackson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

'The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for $10,000 in an action for breach of promise to marry. The defendant appeals.

Mary Falk, the plaintiff, lived near Purcell, in Doniphan county. She was twenty-three years of age and the daughter of a prosperous farmer. William Burke was thirty-three years of age and lived on a farm near Horton. They commenced going together in January, 1912, and became engaged in March of that year. On *95the 4th of August of the same year they each signed the following paper:

“Purcell, Kas., Aug. 4-12.
“T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dwelling-House Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  2. Kelly v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. In re the Insanity of JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Way v. BronstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Wanecek v. KratkyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Kansas v. BurkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API