Legal Opinion

City of Kansas v. Burke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 14, 1914No. 18,736PublishedCited by 2 opinions

OPINION DENYING A REHEARING. Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

In an application for a rehearing much stress is laid upon the claim that appellants were entitled to a jury trial, and that injunction is not the proper remedy to prevent the obstruction of a public highway except where the existence of the highway is conceded. It is argued that in such an action, whether the plaintiff seeks to show the establishment of a public highway by condemnation, prescription or dedication, the mere filing of an answer setting up title in the defendant and denying the existence of a highway entitles the defendant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Kansas City v. BurkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Way v. BronstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Falk v. BurkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Incorporated Town of Polk City v. GemricherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API