People v. Dodson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
A statutory claim that one may not be separately prosecuted for two offenses based on the same act or criminal transaction, as distinguished from a constitutional double jeopardy claim, must be duly preserved if there is to be appellate review.
On November 15, 1976 appellant pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to a charge that she fraudulently demanded a sum of money by virtue of a false instrument. The plea was accepted in satisfaction of a multicount indictment with reference to activities at various times between August…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
4Cited by23 opinions
- People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. PrescottNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. BiggsNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. MichallowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. ArtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.