Legal Opinion
In re Hurd
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.
Motion as an application for an order directing an appraisal and payment for the petitioners’ stock (Stock Corporation Law, §§ 20, 21) in respondent corporation is granted.
The respondent was incorporated in 1934 as part of the reorganization in the course of foreclosure of a defaulted mortgage on the leasehold and building at 1775 Broadway known as the General Motors Building, pursuant to section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 207). The approval of a contract for the sale of the property has evoked the dissent of the petitioners as objecting stockholders. Such issues of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Miglietta (2660 Broadway Corp.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Bacon (Susquehanna Silk Mills)New York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flarsheim v. Twenty Five Thirty Two Broadway Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Eisen v. PostNew York Court of Appeals · 1957