Eisen v. Post
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Fuld, J. (dissenting).
I cannot accept the court’s thesis that the corporation’s sale of the leasehold, the only property it ever owned or, as far as the record discloses, ever intended to own, was made, within the sense of section 20 of the Stock Corporation Law, “ in the regular course of [the corporation’s] business ”, and, in reaching that conclusion, I place no reliance (as the majority apparently does) upon any alleged ultra vires acts performed by, or attributed to, the corporation. As I see the case before us, the question presented, briefly stated, is this: Does section 20 cover a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- In re KuninNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Gamaldi v. ColonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Willcox v. GoessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Starrett Corp. v. Fifth Ave. & Twenty-Ninth St. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.