Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Buckner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1992PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*755OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The determinative issue raised in this appeal is whether an exculpatory clause in a residential lease bars recovery against the landlord for negligence which causes the tenant injury. The trial court granted the landlords’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the tenant’s tort action was barred by the exculpatory clause. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Because we conclude that the exculpatory clause is void as against public policy, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On December 16, 1988, the plaintiff, Linda Crawford, rented an apartment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Empress Health and Beauty Spa, Inc. v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Galligan v. ArovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Crowell v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Perez v. McConkeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Baugh v. NovakTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re BabyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API