Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutton, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority’s treatment of “adverse employment actions” under Title VII, and accordingly join Parts I — III of its opinion in full. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s resolution of the punitive damages issues, and accordingly write separately to explain my disagreement with Parts IV-V of the Court’s opinion.
At the trial in this case, the district court instructed the jury that it may award punitive damages under Title VII only if the plaintiff proved that she was entitled to them by “clear and convincing” proof. In arguing that the district court erred in this…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.