Cooper v. Blood
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR TO ROCK COUNTY COURT. This cause was commenced in the Rock County Court, upon a promissory note. The declaration was in the common counts, with a copy of the note endorsed thereon in conformity with the statute, accompanied with' the usual notice, «fee. The defendant, Cooper, in the court Below, made default.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO ROCK COUNTY COURT. This cause was commenced in the Rock County Court, upon a promissory note. The declaration was in the common counts, with a copy of the note endorsed thereon in conformity with the statute, accompanied with' the usual notice, «fee. The defendant, Cooper, in the court Below, made default. The other defendants Below, Otis P. Bicknell, Edwin Bicknell, and Charles H. Bicknell, pleaded specially, “ that each, every, and all the said several supposed promises in the said plaintiff’s declaration mentioned, if made by them at all, &c.,” were made as sureties for Cooper*,…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Smith, X
The declaration in this case is in the common counts, with a copy of the note endorsed upon it, with the usual notice, and a statement that the suit is brought for no other cause of action.
The copy of the note is as follows : “ For value re*68ceived we and severally promise to pay Wib liam A. Blood, or bearer, four hundred dollars, one year from date, with interest at twenty-five per cent. until Oct. 13, 1849.
(Signed,) Samuel B. Coopek.
Bickhell & Co.
O. P. BlOKMELIi.”
The defendant, Cooper, made default. The defendants Otis P. Bicknell, Edwin Bicknell and Charles it Bicknell…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Fletcher v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Vickery v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Woolsey v. HenkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Peck v. CheneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
- Semel v. DunnCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.