Legal Opinion
Vickery v. Crawford
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1900No. 870PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in. an appeal from Van Zandt County.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
This case is brought before us upon certificate from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth District, presenting the following statement and question:
“Hufnagel Shoe Company sued B. W. Bose and caused a writ of sequestration to issue directed to the sheriff of Van Zandt County, Texas, in full conformity with our statutes governing the writ of sequestration, commanding him to seize certain specific property, being a lot of shoes. The writ was executed by the sheriff by 'seizing and taking into his possession said property. At the time of said seizure, said property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shipman v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Foster v. PettiboneNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Davis v. GambertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Cooper v. BloodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Brown Manufacturing Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crawford v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Sabine Motor Co. v. W. C. English Auto Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Bassham v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Rattan Chevrolet, Inc. v. Associates Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Baldwin Motor Co. v. De FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.