Legal Opinion

(PC) Eric O'Dell v. Cheryl Mims

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00378Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC O’DELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00378-NONE-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 13 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST 14 CHERYL MIMS, (Doc. 25) 15 Defendant. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Defendant moves for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust 18 administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 25.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court 19 recommends that Defendant’s motion be granted. 20 I. SUMMARY OF FACTS 21 At all times…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API