Legal Opinion

Water Works Employees Local No. 1045 v. Board of Water Works

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1980No. 79CA0631PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYTE, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the trial court dismissing their second claim for relief. We affirm.

In 1977, defendants (the board) entered into a three year working agreement with Local 1045, AFSCME, AFL-CIO (the Union). The working agreement contained a grievance procedure which included as its final step the following:

“Section H (Fourth Step) Either party may, five (5) working days after reply from Executive Director, by written notice, request advisory arbitration.” (emphasis added)

Under the agreement, within thirty days after the close of the last hearing on a matter, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blair v. LovettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Superintending School Committee v. Portland Teachers' Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Applehans v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Coors Brewing Co. v. CaboColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Hoffsetz v. Jefferson County School District No. R-1Colorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Lawrence Street Partners, Ltd. v. Lawrence Street VenturersColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API