Legal Opinion

Lee v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1976No. 8638PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

A workmen’s compensation claimant, who recovered from the party liable for his injuries a sum greater than that paid by the intervening insurance carrier, seeks under Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 8307, § 6a, a fee for his attorney payable out of the carrier’s subrogation recoupment on the ground that the carrier’s interest was not actively represented by its attorney. The trial court, finding that the carrier’s interest was actively represented by its attorney, denied the motion for attorney’s fee. The claimant appeals, asserting that the evidence establishes his contention as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Wisdom v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Campbell v. Sonford Chemical CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. McGinnis v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Kaplan v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bluebonnet Farms, Inc. v. Gibraltar Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Brandon v. American Sterilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Hartford Insurance Co. v. Branton & Mendelsohn, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  4. Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Plessner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. International Insurance Co. v. Burnett & Ahders, AssociatedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API