Legal Opinion
Wetzel v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 26, 2005No. 39-JMC-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT
BARKER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand to Marion Superior Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(c) and 1452(d) and/or 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(c)(1) or (2). Defendants removed the case to federal court because, they assert, the case actually involves assets of the bankruptcy estate of Interstate Brands Corporation (“Interstate Brands” or the “Debtor”) and constitutes a “core” bankruptcy proceeding. Plaintiffs argue that their case was wrongly removed from state court, pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1334,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- 17 Collier bankr.cas.2d 230, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,695 in the Matter of Xonics, Inc., Debtors. Elscint, Inc., and Elscint Imaging, Inc. v. First Wisconsin Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Zerand-Bernal Group, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In Re Burneice Turner, D/B/A Bunni's Diamond Inn and F/d/b/a Bunni's Casbar, Bunni's Andy C's, Debtor. Burneice Turner v. Kenneth ErmigerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ADMANCO, Inc. ex rel. Polsky v. 700 Stanton Drive, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- ADMANCO, Inc. ex rel. Polsky v. 700 Stanton Drive, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Application of BuranDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006