Legal Opinion

Burrows v. Mickler

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion;

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney

Mickler, the defendant in error, moves to dismiss the writ of error. He had a money judgment against Burrows and the writ of fi. fa. was in the hands of the sheriff’. The real grounds of the motion are that the judgment and executions have been satisfied and voluntarily paid by Burrows, and that this was done before any supersedeas issued or was served. The motion is supported by the following return or certificate made by the sheriff on the execution* “ I hereby certify that I received the within execution on the 15th day of August, 1885. Executed the within writ in the following manner: On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erwin v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Richeson v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Putnam v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  5. Gregg v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Lumaghi v. AbtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Ting v. BornHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Walker v. SarvenSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  5. Reserve Insurance Company v. McPeakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API