Legal Opinion

Dahl v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 26, 1986No. 3-85-080-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EARL W. SMITH, Justice.

Appellant pleaded guilty to the felony offense of driving while intoxicated and was sentenced by the court to four years in the Department of Corrections (probated) and a fine of $750.00. 1983 Tex.Gen. Laws, ch. 303, § 3, at 1574 (Tex.Rev.Civ. StatAnn. art. 6701Z-1. 1 Appellant stipulated to an Intoxilyzer reading of .21 and does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Appellant brings three gounds of error: (1) the definition of “intoxication” in art. 6701Z-l(a)(2)(B) [1983] is impermissi-bly vague in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. State v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DiCiccoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. State v. Wofford, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Porter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  4. Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. Jack Elwood Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API