Legal Opinion
Hooper v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 22, 2003No. 03-02-00354-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.
Appellant Jack Elwood Hooper appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled-substance analogue of more than four hundred grams. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.123(b)(2) (West Supp.2003). In a bench trial, the trial court found appellant guilty of the offense charged. Appellant “entered a plea of true” to the enhancement paragraph of the indictment alleging a prior felony theft conviction. The trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at fifteen years’ imprisonment. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
Appellant was…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Commonwealth v. HermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Herman, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Brian Scott Sharp v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Herman, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.