Legal Opinion

Steelman v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided July 15, 1992No. 91-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the motion of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) for summary affirmance, appellant’s informal brief, the record on appeal, and the Secretary’s response to the Court’s order of May 27, 1992.(1) In regard to appellant’s claims for entitlement to service connection for back condition and chronic allergies, the Court holds that because appellant has not presented any evidence of a present ratable disability for either condition, he is not entitled to an award of service connection. See Rabideau v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 141, 143-44 (1992).(2) In regard to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  3. Rabideau v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  4. Lichtenfels v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osborne v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  2. Ostermiller v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API