The United States of America Ex Rel. Daniel G. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, the Conference of Chief Justices, Amicus Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
The United States of America appeals the district court’s 1 protective order preventing government attorneys from engaging in ex parte communications with current employees. of the defendant, McDonnell Douglas Corporation (McDonnell Douglas). The government ' also appeals restrictions .placed upon its investigation of former employees. We affirm.
I
This action arose as a qui tam action brought by Daniel O’Keefe under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33, alleging mischarging of labor hours by employees of McDonnell Douglas Corporation (McDonnell Douglas) while…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Guardians Assn. v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Iowa League of Cities v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- New York State Bar Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Olson v. Snap Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.