Legal Opinion

Baysmore v. Brownstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2001No. 1138 EDA 2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, J.:

¶ 1 Bernard Brownstein appeals from the judgment entered against him in a medical malpractice action. This appeal followed the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion for post-trial relief. We affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court summarized the procedural and factual history of this case as follows:

This medical malpractice action arises from Dr. Bernard Brownstein’s (“Defendant”) alleged negligent actions both in prescribing Dilantin, an anti-seizure medication, to Zafirina Baysmore (“Plaintiff’) and in negligently monitoring her condition while she was taking the Dilantin. [Footnote…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Walasavage v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Electronic Laboratory Supply Co. v. CullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Ferko-Fox v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. MummaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Rutyna, A. v. Schweers, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Zappacosta, J. v. McAvoy, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API