Baysmore v. Brownstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, J.:
¶ 1 Bernard Brownstein appeals from the judgment entered against him in a medical malpractice action. This appeal followed the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion for post-trial relief. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court summarized the procedural and factual history of this case as follows:
This medical malpractice action arises from Dr. Bernard Brownstein’s (“Defendant”) alleged negligent actions both in prescribing Dilantin, an anti-seizure medication, to Zafirina Baysmore (“Plaintiff’) and in negligently monitoring her condition while she was taking the Dilantin. [Footnote…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Walasavage v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Electronic Laboratory Supply Co. v. CullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Corrado v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Ferko-Fox v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. MummaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Rutyna, A. v. Schweers, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Zappacosta, J. v. McAvoy, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.