Legal Opinion
Kirby v. Moehlman
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 22, 1944No. Record No. 2772PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The plaintiff, Mrs. Edna Moehlman, is a married woman whose home is in Dayton, Ohio, and has one daughter about twelve years old. The defendant, Miss A. Hopson Kirby, teaches in one of the public schools in Richmond but owns and operates in the summertime a small hotel or boarding house at Virginia Beach. The defendant Mrs. N. C. Rat-cliff, her niece, helps about it but owns no-interest.
A jury’s verdict, confirmed by the court, went against Miss Kirby for $6,500 but not against her niece. She goes out of the case and need not be further considered.
This plaintiff had been a boarder for hire…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Knight v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Davis Bakery, Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
- Lusk v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Yellow Cab Corp. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Eastern Shore of Virginia Agricultural Ass'n v. LeCatoCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Grady Paul Chestnut v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Taboada v. Daly Seven, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Simpson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Burke v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.