Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Peck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1909PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Arthur R. Peck, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Onondaga on the 6th day of July, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury for $5,000, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 13th day of July, 1908, denying the defendant’s motion for a .new trial made upon the minutes.

Read the full summary

Appeal by the defendant, Arthur R. Peck, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Onondaga on the 6th day of July, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury for $5,000, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 13th day of July, 1908, denying the defendant’s motion for a .new trial made upon the minutes. The plaintiff was injured October 20, 1906, by the collapse of bleachers on which he was sitting with others witnessing a game of foot ball between the college teams of Syracuse and Colgate Universities, in…

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

The grand stand and bleachers in Athletic Field were constructed by the Lakeside Railroad Company in 1900 and were intended for public entertainments. The bleachers were made of hemlock timber and were about one hundred and fifty-four feet in length, in sections of fourteen feet each, and of the width of about forty feet. The seats commenced at the ground, extending upwards to the rear, and the rear posts were sixteen feet in height. A more minute description of the structure is unnecessary.

The plaintiff paid the entrance fee to the park and an additional fee for a seat on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swords v. . EdgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Jaffe v. . HarteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Ahern v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Barrett v. Lake Ontario Beach Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Timlin v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Junkermann v. . Tilyou Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Durning v. HymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Campbell v. Elsie S. Holding Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API