Legal Opinion
United States v. Walter Higginbotham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1976No. 76-1398PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and SNEED,' Circuit Judges. KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted in a jury trial on two counts of an indictment charging violation of the Dyer Act, as a principal (18 U.S.C. § 2312), and as aider and abettor in the violation of the Act (18 U.S.C. § 2). His codefendant, Robert Jones, entered a plea of guilty to each count. Jones later testified as a witness on behalf of appellant. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Viewed in the light most favorable to the government, the record supports the following summary of facts.
During the first week in December, 1974, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Frank Stearns GieseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Mark Edwin CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Alexander Danzey and Warren GoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.