Legal Opinion

DiBerardino's, Inc. v. Rome Consolidated School District

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John R. Tenney, J.

The defendants have moved for summary judgment on both these claims, or in the alternative, a joint trial.

*289Since both these claims present the same fact situation and the same legal problem, the motions should be considered together.

The substance of each argument for summary judgment is that the proper remedy to contest an award of a public contract is by a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The argument continues that there can be no action for damages for failure to award a public contract after a bid procedure has been followed.

Plaintiff contends that it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gross v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  2. Mason Stationery Products, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Latin Belly Ltd. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stride Contracting Corp. v. Board of Contract & SupplyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Seneca Mineral Co. v. County of ChautauquaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API