Weatherford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BÉSSEY, P. J.
Arthur Weatherford, plaintiff in error, here designated the defendant, was convicted of the larceny of a calf. The jury fixed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
Without reciting the details, the evidence is clear and convincing that the theft was committed by the defendant as charged. His only claim of justification is that his accomplice in crime turned informer and assisted in trapping him, which of course is no defense at all.
Defendant claims that the district court was without jurisdiction because the examining magistrate had not properly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Muldrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ponoksy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Christian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Flint v. SaterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Flint v. SaterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962