Legal Opinion

Weatherford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 28, 1925No. A-4721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BÉSSEY, P. J.

Arthur Weatherford, plaintiff in error, here designated the defendant, was convicted of the larceny of a calf. The jury fixed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Without reciting the details, the evidence is clear and convincing that the theft was committed by the defendant as charged. His only claim of justification is that his accomplice in crime turned informer and assisted in trapping him, which of course is no defense at all.

Defendant claims that the district court was without jurisdiction because the examining magistrate had not properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Muldrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Ponoksy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Christian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Flint v. SaterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Flint v. SaterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API