Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Flint v. Sater

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1962No. A-13241, A-13245Published

1Concurrence

BRETT, Judge.

I concur in the conclusion expressed in the opinion by Judge BUSSEY. I feel impelled to give a detailed account of the reasons for my conclusions, first, because of the gravity of the questions before us in this matter, and second, because of the fact that my notes may prove of some value to the legislature in the event it should desire their availability on reconsideration of the legislative question involved herein.

We must begin with the fundamental axiom that all men are presumed to be sane, and such presumption will continue until a contrary conclusion has been reached as…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. In Re AmblerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Brown v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. McCurdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Ex Parte McNaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API