Legal Opinion

Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1998No. 1-95-2736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Plaintiff Harold Weiland brought suit against defendant Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc., alleging claims for breach of warranty and product liability regarding two pacemakers implanted into his body. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendant on the claims because it determined that those claims were preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (MDA) (21 U.S.C.A. §§ 360c through 360k (West Supp. 1998)) to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) (21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq. (West Supp. 1998)). Plaintiff appealed.

For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On July 26,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing System, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Weiland v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API