Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Young v. Nederlander

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1913No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Assumpsit by Edward Young and wife in the name of the people of the State of Michigan against George H. Reissman, principal, and Joseph Nederlander, surety, on the bond of Reissman as a notary public. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Nederlander brings érror.

1Opinion of the CourtBied, J.

This action was instituted to recover for a breach of'the notarial bond of defendant Reissman. The plaintiffs had judgment against both Reissman and his surety, Nederlander, in the trial court, and defendant Nederlander, who alone defended, assigns error thereon.

It appears that on September 12, 1910, defendant Reissman sold to plaintiffs, upon contract, two lots in the city of Detroit, for a consideration of $1,000, $500 of which was paid down, leaving a deferred payment of $500. Less than 30 days thereafter, Reiss-' man sought out the plaintiffs, and represented to them that his client was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oakland Bank of Savings v. MurfeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People ex rel. Doran v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Nolan v. LabatutSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Wyllis v. HaunSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Governor of Wisconsin ex rel. Mlekus v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. AndresCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Atlas Security Co. v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API