Legal Opinion

Plote, Inc. v. Minnesota Alden Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 2, 1981No. 80-3091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Minnesota Alden, a limited partnership, filed a petition with the circuit court of Cook County to enjoin the disbursement of $19,200 to the Village of Schaumburg. The trial court denied petitioner’s motion and, from that order, petitioner has taken this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307. See Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110A, par. 307.

In 1972, Minnesota Alden sought approval from the Village of Schaumburg (the Village) for construction of a 744-unit apartment complex on land zoned Single Family District (R6). The Planned Unit Development (PUD), which was to include 108…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. Village of Mount ProspectIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Treadway v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Duggan v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Telenois, Inc. v. Village of SchaumburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Hartz Construction v. Village of Western SpringsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. Hartz Const. v. Village of Western SpringsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API