Legal Opinion

United States v. Dominick Sabella and Charles Lacascia

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 1959No. 116, Docket 25767PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

An inadvertent error made by Congress in 1954 in recasting the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relating to the sale of narcotics has given rise to the problems in the law of double jeopardy which this case presents. Reluctant as we are that two guilty defendants should profit from a mistake that has in no wise prejudiced them, we think their pleas of double jeopardy should have been sustained and accordingly reverse the judgments convicting them of a second offense.

In the course of enacting the Internal Revenue Code that was approved August 16, 1954, Congress…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Stephen KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Hoffler v. BezioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Garcia-RosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API