Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kurlan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1953No. L. A. 22094Published

1Dissent

CARTER, J.—I dissent.

I concur in the reversal of the judgment but I cannot concur in the greater part of the reasoning and law propounded in the majority opinion.

It is stated by the majority that “Kurlan’s complaint shows that any property interest which McKenney may have had in either the story or characters of ‘My Sister Eileen’ has been lost by publication.” The pleading shows that the story and characters were made public in a play, picture, magazines and books. It also shows that the stories had never been presented on the air and that by written agreement plaintiff’s assignor had…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Kalem Co. v. Harper BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Palmer v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Ferris v. FrohmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API