Legal Opinion · Dissent

General Foods Corporation v. Perk Foods Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 12, 1970No. 16887_1Published

1Dissent

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

I respectfully dissent. In Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, 274-275, 69 S.Ct. 535, 537-538, 93 L.Ed. 672 (1949), the Supreme Court emphasized the deference that appellate courts should give to findings made by trial courts in patent cases when there is a conflict in the evidence and the trial court has had the benefit of scientific demonstrations. There the Court said:

To no type of case is this last clause [Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a)] more ap*950propriately applicable than to the one before us, where the evidence is largely the testimony of experts as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Indiana General Corporation v. Lockheed Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Indiana General Corp. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1966
  5. Application of Douglas H. MoretonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API