Legal Opinion

Barrett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1924No. 15277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Luke, J-.

1. Where the defense of alibi is set up by the defendant’s statement alone, a charge thereon is not necessary, in the absence of a timely written request. Brundage v. State, 14 Ga. App. 460 (2) (81 S. E. 384); Reed v. State, 15 Ga. App. 435 (1) (83 S. E. 674); Sheffield v. State, 15 Ga. App. 514 (3) (83 S. E. 871); Holliday v. State, 23 Ga. App. 400 (3) (98 S. E. 386).(a) Where the evidence offered to establish an alibi is weak and inconclusive, there is no error in the failure of the court to charge the jury specifically on the subject, in the absence of a request to give such a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holliday v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Brundage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wynes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API