Legal Opinion

Wynes v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1936No. 11257PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

Clarence Wynes and Mrs. Mitt Wynes were jointly indicted and tried for the offense of murder, and were convicted. Motions for new trial were overruled, and each of them excepted.

In several of the grounds of the motion for new trial it appears that the defendant objected to the admission of evidence on certain grounds at the time it was introduced. In the motion for 'new trial additional reasons are given as to why the evidence was inadmissible. The attention of the court must be called to *435tbe specific ground of objection at tbe time tbe evidence is offered, and the failure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Taylor v. THE STATESupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Aycock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. West v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API