Shia v. Pendergrass
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Fishbtjrne, Justice.
The complaint states a cause of action for injunctive relief against the respondent, from entering upon, trespassing on. and interfering with the appellant in the use and possession of a certain strip of land constituting part of a lot owned by her in the City of Florence.
The respondent by answer sets up two defenses: (1) That the strip of land in question constitutes an alleyway dedicated to the use of the public and to the City of Florence by the former owner, Mrs. C. M. Berry; (2) That the respondent has a right of way over the said driveway which is appurtenant to his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Steele v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Stanley v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Haman v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Hoogenboom v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Derby Heights, Inc. v. Gantt Water & Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- City of Scottsdale v. MochoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.