Legal Opinion

Holzberger v. Schoentag

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John H. Galloway, Jr., J.

In this proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR, petitioners seek an order in the nature of mandamus removing the respondent from the office of Supervisor of the Town of Beekman, Dutchess County, on the ground that he is not a resident elector of said town in accordance with section 23 of the Town Law.

It appears from the pleadings and supporting papers that respondent was .re-elected to the office of Supervisor for a fifth two-year term in the general election of November, 1965, to commence January 1, 1966. Petitioners allege that he was not a resident elector of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brescia v. MugridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Aiello v. PowerNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Scarfone v. RuggieriNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Altimari v. MeisserNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Caligiuri v. MaiselNew York Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fawkes v. SarauwSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  2. Lewis v. Beacon Urban Renewal AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Riccio v. BoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API