Legal Opinion

Flounders v. Southern Pennsylvania Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1924No. Appeal, No. 14PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellee was injured in a right-angled collision when his automobile was struck by a street car. His view along the highway for some distance from the track was entirely obstructed by a high bank, trees, etc., until within close proximity to the rails. Defendant, appellant here, claims, and this is the only point in the case, appellee should have descended from his ear, gone forward and looked up and down the track to ascertain if street cars were approaching. The court below permitted a recovery; in this there was no error.

While it is very seldom a street is so…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Philadelphia Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. McClung v. Pennsylvania Taximeter Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Smathers v. Pittsburg & Butler Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Omslaer v. Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Talley v. Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Davis v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Ehrhart v. York Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Weschler v. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Dopler v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API