Legal Opinion
Toohey v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp. Health & Welfare Plan
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 26, 2010No. Civil No. 09-88-STPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stewart referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation [97] in this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [69] and defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [73] be granted in part and denied in part. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Toohey v. WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORP. HEALTH & WELFAREDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010