Legal Opinion

Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1982No. Nos. 81-5348, 81-5349PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

This case presents questions regarding the entry and modification of a consent decree in an employment discrimination case. In 1977, Plaintiff-appellee Carl Stotts filed a class action against the City of Memphis, alleging that the Fire Department’s hiring and promotion policies were racially discriminatory. After three years of discovery and intensive negotiations, the Stotts suit was settled by a consent decree in 1980 (“1980 Decree”). No trial was held. The 1980 Decree was intended to supplement an earlier consent decree entered in 1974 which affected employment…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Berger v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API