Legal Opinion

Central Stikstof Verkoopkanter, N v. V. Pensacola Port Authority

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1963No. 20072PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Agreeing with the opinion of the District Court in this case, D.C., 205 F. Supp. 724, we affirm with the following-additional comments.

Appellant amended after the reported first dismissal to allege the maintenance of captive fires on and adjacent to the Port Authority docks in the form of steam operated ships, cranes, derricks, and drag-lines on which steam boilers were fired by oil or coal, and that one such ship was secured to its docks at the time the fire in suit was discovered. There was no allegation whatever of any causal connection between such al leged captive fire or fires and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKinney Supply Company v. OrovitzSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Centraal Stikstof Verkoopkantoor N v. v. Pensacola Port AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. George McGovern v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Bergen Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Japan Marine Serv., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Marrero v. Albany InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1989
  4. Dickerson, Inc. v. BuckleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  5. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Company, and Master's International, Inc. v. Almacenes Miramar, Inc., Fireman's Fund American Insurance Company v. Almacenes Miramar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API