Legal Opinion

Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Kenney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1902No. 4,491PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application by Chicago & Southeastern Railway Company for a temporary injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oubiam.

The Chicago and Southeastern Railway Company applied to, and obtained from, this court a temporary restraining order, and the question now for determination is whether the company is entitled to a temporary injunction pendente lite. The record shows that upon the application of appellee and others to the judge of the Clay Circuit Court in vacation, a receiver for the corporation was appointed. The receiver was appointed on the ground that the company was insolvent, and, in the order of appointment, a finding was made that it was insolvent. At the time of the appointment, the Olay…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. KenneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Brinkman v. RitzingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Lewis v. FillionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brock v. RudigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Ruman v. EskewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API