Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oklahoma City v. Grigsby

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1935No. 25802Published

1Dissent

OSBORN, V. C. J.

(dissenting). I agree with my associates that the city is vested with authority to regulate the business of selling beer, but I cannot agree that section 11, chapter 204, S. L. 1933, (Sp. Sess.), (House Bill No. 28), operates to prohibit the city from charging a fee for a permit for the operation of such business within the city limits so long as the fee for such permit does not exceed the actual cost of issuing the license, inspecting and regulating the business.

Ordinance No. 4485 of the city of Oklahoma City prohibits the sale or distribution of any nonintoxicating alcoholic…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Royall v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Mayor of New York v. Second Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API