Legal Opinion

State v. Kearns

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1975No. 7520SC43PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The sole question argued by defendant on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in allowing an SBI agent to testify for the State as to an alleged confession made by the defendant in view of the fact that the agent was not present during the entire interrogation during which the defendant purportedly confessed to the crime charged.

Upon defendant’s objection the trial court conducted a voir dire hearing in the absence of the jury to determine the admissibility of any statements made by the defendant to Special SBI Agent Ronald Hawley. Hawley testified on voir dire that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MarshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. . PrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. State v. BarnwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API