Legal Opinion
Gunpowder Riverkeeper v. Wheeler
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 23, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-2063Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GUNPOWDER RIVERKEEPER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02063-CJN MICHAEL S. REGAN, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Gunpowder Riverkeeper challenges the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of Maryland’s proposed total maximum daily load of polychlorinated biphenyls for the Gunpowder and Bird Rivers. See generally Compl. In Count 1 of its Complaint, Riverkeeper alleges that the EPA failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty to disapprove…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States Department of Energy v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sierra Club v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, American Mining Congress, National Coal Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.