People v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
Quamie Brown was convicted following a jury trial of two counts of assault with a deadly weapon. On appeal Brown contends the guilty verdicts for aggravated assault, as opposed to the lesser included offense of simple assault, are not supported by substantial evidence and the court committed prejudicial error in instructing the jury with the erroneous definition of “deadly weapon” contained in CALCRIM No. 875. Although we agree CALCRIM No. 875’s definition of “deadly weapon,” which includes objects that are inherently “dangerous” as well as inherently “deadly,” is, at…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. ZamudioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. AledamatCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. B.M. (In re B.M.)California Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Jonathan R.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Stutelberg, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. D.T.California Court of Appeal · 2015
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.