Legal Opinion
Granite State Concrete Co. v. Surface Transportation Board
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 29, 2005No. 04-2551PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
At issue is an order of the Surface Transportation Board (STB) finding that one railroad acted reasonably in light of rail safety concerns when it imposed restrictions upon another railroad operating on its lines.
The petitioners in this case are the railroad subjected to restrictions, the Milford-Bennington Railroad Company (MBRR), and its only customer, the Granite State Concrete Company (Granite State). The respondent is the STB. The intervenors are the other railroad which imposed those restrictions, the Boston and Maine Corporation, and Springfield Terminal Railway…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Wales Transportation, Inc. And Steel Carriers' Tariff Association, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- National Grain & Feed Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Royal Siam Corp. v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- The Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Northwest Bypass Group v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
- Del Grosso v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Padgett v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.