Legal Opinion

Fordyce v. Kansas City & N. Connecting R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided April 16, 1906No. 2,402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIPS, District Judge.

In the memorandum opinion just handed down in Nos. 2401-2404 the court has discussed certain principles and rules of law which are applicable to some of the cases here to be reviewed on exceptions to the master’s report, to which reference is made without here restating them.

Claim of the Kansas City Southern Railway Company.

These claims are predicated of judgments of the receivers of the Gulf Company against the Northern Company. On the facts found by the *567master, these claims musí be rejected for two reasons: (1) It is not perceived as matter of tact that the credits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Central Trust Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Pittsburgh & W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Zimmerman v. Kansas City Northwestern R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Hobbs v. State Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guardian Trust Co. v. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API