Legal Opinion
Appeal of Wintle
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 26, 2001No. 99-521PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The petitioner, Gary Wintle, appeals a decision of the New Hampshire Compensation Appeals Board (board) denying him double workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to RSA 281-A:33 (1999). We affirm.
The following facts are undisputed. The petitioner has worked for General Electric (GE) since 1979 manufacturing airplane parts. The petitioner has been injured twice on the job while using a pneumatic clamping device. The first accident occurred in 1994 when he caught part of his right hand in the machine. In 1997, the petitioner again caught part of his right hand in the machine, amputating the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barrows v. BolesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Aubert v. AubertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Conrad v. HazenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Olson v. Town of FitzwilliamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- In re of AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of AeronauticsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Mondnock v. Town of PeterboroughDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
- Bel-Air Nursing and Rehab Center, Inc. v. Town of Goffstown, New Hampshire & Goffstown Zoning Board of AdjustmentDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- In re New Hampshire Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004