Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lindsay v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1979No. 53939Published

1DissentDally, Judge

V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 15.02, unlike Art. 1622, V.A.P.C. (1925), requires an overt act to be committed to constitute the substantive offense of conspiracy. Except for *573an allegation of the overt act, I see no reason why an indictment for the substantive offense of conspiracy under the new penal code should be different than under the former penal code. Under the former penal code, this Court held that it was unnecessary to allege the means by which the conspiracy was to be accomplished. See Garza v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 413, 55 S.W.2d 1042 (1932); Echols v. State, 133 Tex.Cr.R. 121, 109…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Echols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API