Echols v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge. —
Conviction is for conspiracy to commit the offense of burglary, punishment assessed being confinement in the penitentiary for life, under averments and proof that appellant was an habitual criminal. (Art. 68, P. C.)
The indictment is rather unusual in that it does not purport to be a joint indictment against all parties named as conspirators, but seems to proceed against appellant only. The charging part of the indictment is as follows:
“* * * J. D. Echols did, then and there unlawfully, together with Earl Adams, Frank Hardy, J. H. Nowlin and L. N. Yantis, conspire, combine,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Benavides v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Pauly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Otto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lindsay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Lindsay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957